2 beginners trading at precisely the moment, exact same pair, one long and one will both end up loosing the commerce.
2 beginners trading at precisely the moment, exact same pair, one long and one will both end up loosing the commerce.
Here's a hint that goes for everything in your daily life lietuve: If something works fine, don't try to fix it! Only my 2 pips.Originally Posted by ;
Around three years ago I had that system: I transferred into a new Forex broker, also there was ADX that I wasn't familiar with, so somehow I chased it, and did everything just opposite; I was earning money like mad, occasionally, just for the sake of the joke, and it worked; finally I decided to know more about such an awesome index. I read description, and realized my mistake, therefore after adjusting it to configurations of 14 and paying attention to crosses, I started to trade the right way in fourteen months there was left in my account. I will never touch the ADX again (unless the wrong way if I'd remember the settings that I used afterward ). It was only ADX sign that I was paying attention to: everytime it was, and based I would do just opposite. To put it differently, I sold shirts and buying pliers ! You should start looking into it.
Al, For kicks I played with this notion on an EA. It was easier to have it to become profitable during a long term than composing you to become profitable using a winning system. Profitable trading is not simply a notion of entry points, but depart points also. Then everyone would do it, if is do precisely the contrary of what we think and also the notion gets not a losing platform but a winnning system thereby negating the thought anyhow. Just if we sit down to understand the basic laws of trading utilizing supply/demand issues together with willingness to pay prices at certain levels, do we get a concept of possible direction. The ch is, that these amounts are constantly changing. We have to be ready to accommodate (and sometimes fast ) into the new market psyschology. Master this and you master your transactions! Good luck!Originally Posted by ;
I would rather have a tighter system .Originally Posted by ;
ولكن إذا كنت تريد حقًا أن تخسر شيئًا ما ، فقم بفقدان السوائل الإضافية. مجرد funnin ”فقط قليلا معك آل” لأنني معجب بك.
يتصل
مرحبًا ، هل اسم المستخدم Spartan بسبب MSU؟
Hey, try it out, I do not dismiss anything. I just know I have ignored that dude's advice because it was awful. He's not in the company of making money on FX, he is in the company of making money off people seeking to make money at FX. BTW, I have a service that will tell you how to be a millionaire! Think about that statement long and hard...
إذا كنت تريد خاسرًا ، تحقق من نشر علم التنجيم هذا مؤخرًا. إذا كنت تريد فائزًا بالتأكيد ، فلا تستمع إلى الرجل الذي أفهم أنك حصلت على هذه الفكرة منه. لن أنشر اسمه لأنني على وشك الحظر على أي حال ...
من السهل استبعاد فكرته ولكن لماذا لا نفكر في ذلك؟ عندما يوفر نظام إشارات خاطئة أكثر من 90 بالمائة من الوقت حيث ينتظر SL = TP Hmm انتظار. . .هل يجب أن يكون SL = TP 2 × انتشار لجعلها قابلة للعكس لهذا الغرض؟ عندما يكون السبريد 4 نقاط وتريد أن يصبح TP 30 ، يجب أن يكون SL بعد ذلك 38. لذلك إذا كان نظامك خاطئًا 90٪ من الوقت مع TP في 30 و SL في 38 على سبيل المثال ، سيكون لديك نظام يقدم لك الإشارات المثالية 90 في المائة من الوقت عندما تقوم بعكس إدخالاتك. أعتقد أن هذا ما تجاهلته عندما فكرت في نفس الشيء بالضبط من قبل. أعتقد أنه لن يكون من السهل برمجة نظام خاطئ أكثر من 90 في المائة من الوقت مع TPSL المعدل ولكن قد يكون من المثير للاهتمام استكشاف المزيد قليلاً لمعرفة ما إذا كان هناك شيء ينبثق.